Wednesday, 23 December 2015

Topic Guide for Special Conference

SPECIAL CONFERENCE
 AGENDA: Threats to International Peace and Security Caused by Terrorist Acts
“Missiles may kill terrorists, but good governance kills terrorism.”
305 Introduction Terrorism continues to threaten the entire international community, as barely a week passes without news reports of terrorist acts committed in different parts of the globe.306 It endangers innocent civilians, and no one is secure from this risk.307 Since 1934, terrorism has been discussed internationally, when the League of Nations wrote a document on terrorism; it was adopted in 1937, but was never ratified.308 As of 2015 the United Nations (UN) has not adopted a universal definition of terrorism, which limits the ability for Member States and the international community in creating a world free from terrorism.309 However, different definitions may be found in the documents of the Security Council (SC) and other UN bodies.310
SC resolution 1566 (2004) condemns:  "criminal acts, including against civilians, committed with the intent to cause death or serious bodily injury, or taking of hostages, with the purpose to provoke a state of terror in the general public or in a group of persons or particular persons, intimidate a population or compel a government or an international organization to do or to abstain from doing any act, which constitute offences within the scope of and as defined in the international conventions and protocols relating to terrorism, are under no circumstances justifiable by considerations of a political, philosophical, ideological, racial, ethnic, religious or other similar nature."
Since 2001, the SC has taken greater measures to address the issue of terrorism and has encouraged Member States to suppress the methods and means to commit terrorist acts, criminalize terrorist activities, and to cooperate with one another in investigation process, detection and prosecution of terrorists.312 More recently, the issues of foreign terrorist fighters and youth extremism have become particularly challenging for the international community.313 The number of recruited fighters who have joined the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), Al-Qaida, and other groups has increased to over 25,000 individuals this year, and terrorist groups are actively recruiting young, disenfranchised people into their ranks via internet and particularly social media portals making the ability to inhibit these challenges difficult.314  International and Regional Framework Since 1963, the international community has created 18 universal legal instruments on counter-terrorism, including 14 initial documents and 4 substantive amendments. 315 These addressed the problem of terrorism and specific types of terroristic activities and their targets, such as civil aviation, maritime navigation, hostages, nuclear materials, platforms located on the continental shelf, and financing of terrorism.316 Since the terrorist attacks on 11 September 2001 in New York, at least 10 of 16 conventions have been ratified or acceded to by two-thirds of Member States.317 The most recent legal instruments relating to anti-terrorism were adopted in 2010.318 These are: the Convention on the Suppression of Unlawful Acts Relating to International Civil Aviation (2010), which has not yet come into force  and the Protocol Supplementary to the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Seizure of Aircraft (2010).319 Both the Convention and the Protocol criminalize the usage of civil aviation as means to conduct terroristic attacks including placing an explosive device on an aircraft and authorizing the aircraft commander to take reasonable measures against an individual that poses a threat to the safety of the aircraft.
Since 2000, within the framework of the Ad Hoc Committee established pursuant to the General Assembly (GA) resolution on “measures to eliminate international terrorism,” Member States have worked towards a convention on international terrorism.321 This would supplement the existing framework and adhere to the guiding principles of international anti-terrorism conventions.322 The draft includes the criminalization of terrorist acts, prosecution or extradition for perpetrators, exclusion of the exceptions to such criminalization on various grounds from legislation, and calls on Member States to cooperate, exchange information, assist in the processes of investigation, and take all necessary measures to prevent terroristic acts.323 However, the convention has been delayed by the inability of Member States to agree upon a common definition of terrorism.324 While the proposed definition itself is not seen as controversial by Member States, the debate falters on two arguments: that this definition should include the use of armed forces against civilians by the state and that people under foreign occupation have a right to armed struggle against the oppressors, which means that any definition can not contradict this right.325 
United Nations Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy
In December 2004, the High-level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change first stated the need for a global counter-terrorism strategy to target the factors that contribute to the outspread of international terrorism, reinforce the rule of law, and promote human rights.326 In his report on 27 April 2006, UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan presented five pillars for the future common strategy, which includes deterring groups from resorting to terrorism, preventing terrorist groups from acquiring means to carry out terroristic attacks, have states refrain from supporting terrorist groups, strengthening the capacity of Member States to combat counter-terrorism, and defending human rights in relation to terrorism and counter-terrorism activities.327 On 8 September 2006 the Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy was adopted.328 This global instrument provides a framework for both the UN system and Member States to strengthen capacity to prevent and combat terrorism, ensuring the respect to human rights and rule of law.329 It also reiterates that terrorism may be defeated only if the UN focuses on prevention rather than reaction to terrorist activities.330 Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has announced his intention to present a comprehensive plan of action to prevent violent extremism to the GA in 2016.331 This plan will build upon the Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy to establish a system-wide approach for addressing the root causes of terrorism, as well as recommending individual and collective action to counter the spread of extremism.

Security Council
The SC did not focus on the issue of terrorism until the adoption of resolution 1373 (2001), which called upon Member States to become parties to these conventions and established the Counter-Terrorism Committee (CTC) as a subsidiary body of the SC.333 Resolution 1373 criminalized financing of terrorism, called upon Member States to freeze all assets related to those involved in terrorist activities, to cease any sources of financial support for terrorists, cooperate with other states in fighting terrorism, and demanded that Member States implement specific measures aimed at strengthening their capacity to prevent terrorist activities.334  
In September 2005, resolution 1624 (2005) on incitement to commit acts of terrorism was adopted by the SC.335 The resolution required Member States to include the prohibition of incitement in their legislation and ensure the prosecution of those, "with respect to whom there is credible and relevant information giving serious reasons for considering that they have been guilty of such conduct."336 Finally, the most recent resolution on the agenda item of the “threat to international peace and security caused by terrorist acts” was adopted by the SC on 12 February 2015.337 In resolution 2199 (2015) the SC encouraged a number of financial measures to counter terrorism, such as assets freezing, closure of any sources of financing for terrorist organizations, condemned any trade relations with Al-Qaida associated groups and urged Member States take all necessary measures to prevent terrorists in Iraq and Syria from benefiting from oil, hostages, and antiques trade.338 To note, according to the provisions of this resolution, Member States have to report to Al-Qaida Sanctions Committee within 120 days of the implementation of the resolution.339
 Regional and sub-regional instruments
 Many legal frameworks for combating terrorism have been adopted by regional organizations.340 These documents include the organizations’ own definitions of terrorism, measures to prevent and combat terrorist crimes, legal basis of the issue, including the extradition of the criminals, and the framework for cooperation among Member States, such as information exchange.341 The Organization of American States was the first to adopt its regional Convention To Prevent And Punish The Acts Of Terrorism Taking The Form Of Crimes Against Persons And Related Extortion That Are Of International Significance (1971).342 It was followed by the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation Regional Convention on Suppression of Terrorism (1987), European Convention on the Suppression of Terrorism (1977) and Arab Convention on the Suppression of Terrorism (1998).343 In 1999, the Convention of the Organization of the Islamic Conference on Combating International Terrorism (1999), Organisation of the African Unity Convention on the Prevention and Combating of Terrorism (1999), and Treaty on Cooperation among the States Members of the Commonwealth of Independent States in Combating Terrorism (1999) were all adopted.344


 Role of the International System
 In 1996, the UN General Assembly created the Ad Hoc Committee on Terrorism, which works with the GA Sixth Committee on the international legal aspects of strengthening the efforts of Member States in countering terrorism.345 The body conducts biannual reviews of Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy, the most recent of which was introduced in June 2014.346 The UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) and the Counter-Terrorism Implementation Task Force (CTITF) provide technical assistance to the Member States.347 UNODC helps Member States with implementing legal frameworks on terrorism and terrorist financing, while CTITF implements the UN’s counter-terrorism efforts and provides support to all Member States.348 In October 1999 through resolution 1267 (1999) the SC established the Sanctions Committee and introduced the sanctions regime for individuals and entities associated with Al-Qaida and the Taliban.349 These sanctions included assets freeze, arm embargo and travel ban.350 In 201l, with resolutions 1988 (2011) and 1989 (2011), the SC separated Al-Qaeda and the Taliban sanctions list.351 After establishing the CTC, in 2004 the SC established the CTC Executive Directorate to facilitate technical assistance to Member States and monitor the implementation of Resolution 1373.352 Also in 2004, the SC established the 1540 Committee to monitor the implementation of resolution 1540.353  
The subject of human rights in the context of terrorism and counter-terrorism has been an issue since the establishment of the CTC in 2001 and from then has paid more attention to its human rights policy.354 Specifically, the Executive Directorate was mandated to liaise with the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights and other human rights organizations in the context of counter-terrorism.355 In 2005, Member States affirmed their commitment to protect human rights in the process of the fight against international terrorism through the establishment of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms while countering terrorism.356 Among the tasks of the Special Rapporteur are identifying and exchanging best practices in countering terrorism with respect to human rights, maintaining dialogue with the governments on the possible areas of cooperation, and making specific recommendations on promotion and protection of human rights while countering terrorism.357 Through resolution 1566, the SC established a Working Group to recommend possible measures against individuals and groups involved in terrorist activities as well to discuss the creation of fund to assist the victims of terrorism.358 On 28 July 2015, the SC held its most recent debate on threats to international peace and security caused by terrorist acts and issued a presidential statement in which it expressed its condemnation of all terroristic attacks and violations of international law by Boko Haram in West Africa and underlined the importance of sustained national and regional efforts to assist the conflict-affected population and provide it with all possible support.359
Counter-Terrorism Implementation Task Force
The CTITF was created by the Secretary-General in 2005 and approved by the GA through the Global Counter- Terrorism Strategy.360 In June 2013, the CTITF held a high-level “International Counter-Terrorism Focal Points Conference on Addressing Conditions Conducive to the Spread of Terrorism and Promoting Regional Cooperation,” which gathered experts and official representatives from more than 100 Member States and regional and international organizations.361 The participants of the Conference identified the key challenges, priorities and ways to successfully implement Pillar I of the UN Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy – addressing conditions conductive to the spread of terrorism - at the global, regional, and local levels.362 Participants expressed their support for socioeconomic development, conflict prevention and peaceful resolution, supporting victims of terrorism, and elaborating counter-radicalization programs.363 Attendees further reiterated the importance of regional and international cooperation among the Member States, and underlined that respect for human rights and liberties and countering extremism may not be considered mutually exclusive.364
                                                                
Role of the Regional Organizations
 In 2004 the African Union (AU) established the African Centre for the Study and Research on Terrorism (ACSRT) with the aim to accumulate information and analyses on terrorism, provide cooperation between AU Member States and expand the Counter-Terrorism capacity building programs for the region.365 The Director of ACSRT holds the position of AU Special Representative for Counter-Terrorism Cooperation.366 The position was established in 2010 to provide support to the AU in assessing the situation within Member States and identifying major steps to counter terrorism.367 Similarly, Counter-terrorism initiatives of the Organization of American States are mostly provided through the Inter-American Committee against Terrorism (CICTE), created in 1999.368 With the help of CICTE American states have enhanced their cooperation in financial control against money laundering and financing of terrorism, and improved the quality of identification and travel documents control.369 The Council of Europe has also organized many international conferences related to terrorism on topics such as: preventing terrorist acts, bringing terrorists to justice, and protecting victims.370 Additionally, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe works actively on suppressing money-laundering and ensuring border security, while also assisting participating countries to elaborate and implement counter-terrorism measures that also follow human rights standards.371  
Foreign Terrorist Fighters
The threat to international peace and security caused by the foreign terrorist fighters (FTF) has become one of the most crucial issues to be addressed by the international community.372 Since the beginning of the conflict in Syria, over 25,000 FTF from more than 80 Member States have joined ISIL and the Al-Nusra Front.373 For the first time, the SC addressed this issue by unanimously adopting resolution 2178 on 24 September 2014, defining FTF as “individuals who travel abroad to a State rather than their States of residence or nationality to engage in, undertake, plan, prepare, carry out or otherwise support terrorist activity or to provide or receive training to do so.” The SC also condemned violent extremism and reiterated the necessity to prevent travel and support for FTF.374 The resolution further demands that Member States amend their legislation to enable the prosecution of those travelling or attempting to travel for terrorism purposes.375 On 23 September 2014 the Global Counterterrorism Forum adopted the “Hague-Marrakech Memorandum on Good Practices for a More Effective Response to the FTF Phenomenon.”376 The document included good practices in four parts of the FTF issue: radicalization to violent extremism, recruitment and facilitation, travel and fighting, as well as return and reintegration.377 The memorandum was aimed at helping the governments elaborate their policies in regard to counter-terrorism.
On 29 May 2015 the SC held a meeting, to which for the first time the Ministers of the Interior were specifically invited, to discuss the first report of the CTC on the implementation of the SC resolution 2178 by states affected by the FTF problem.379 The first report underlined the necessity to enhance the information exchange among the states, which drew attention to the significant risks posed by returning terrorist fighters and discussed the issue of human rights in the context of countering terrorism.380 In a Presidential Statement, adopted at this meeting, the SC stressed the need for Member States to establish laws criminalizing recruitment, transportation and provision of FTF with weapons and financing; strengthen border management; and more effectively address radicalization particularly among youth.381 The Statement also urged the better cooperation, exchange of information, and use of terrorist database with the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL).382 The Secretary-General of INTERPOL, Mr. Jurgen Stock stressed the necessity of making more information available to personnel working directly at the border, particularly to the border screeners.383  
In resolution 2178, the SC also urged Member States to create new or strengthen the existing legal basis to address the flow of FTFs into Syria and Iraq.384 Member States have so far implemented their multi-dimensional responses to the threat posed by FTFs, thus already showing the potential of Resolution 2178 to bring major impact towards resolving this issue.385 Nevertheless, according to the report released by the CTC, the amount of FTFs continues to grow rapidly.386 In his statement Mr. Jean-Paul Laborde, Assistant Secretary-General of CTC Executive Directorate said that despite all the measures taken by Member States it is still easy for any person wishing to join terrorist groups to contact a recruiter unanimously.387 He underlined the importance of advance passenger aviation system to enhance border and aviation security and once again reiterated the importance terrorist financing issue.
 Youth and Extremism
The interest of extremist groups in youth has increased in the past decade, with the majority of FTFs being young males aged 15-25.389 On 23 April 2015, the SC held its first open debate on the role of youth in countering violent extremism and promoting peace.390 Factors leading to the radicalization of youth include unemployment, personal trauma, and unmet expectations of their future.391 This threat may be mitigated by push factors for youth radicalization such as strengthening public-private cooperation, educating youth, and supporting youth initiatives and organizations.392 During the briefing the Secretary-General claimed “the role of youth lies at the heart of international peace and security.”393 During the debate representatives of Member States also stressed attention on the necessity to target the issue of incitement to violent extremism and the use of the Internet by terrorist groups to recruit youth.394 Youth are recruited into joining such causes through different means, but it is most heavily done via the Internet.
Radicalized youth have been shown to be a major threat to international peace, stability, and development as they will abandon their education and derail the community’s development endeavors.396 In June 2015 a conference entitled “Youth and the Internet: Fighting Radicalization and Extremism” was held at the UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) headquarters in Paris.397 The role of the Internet in youth radicalization, the experiences of Member States, and research on the issue were all discussed in an attempt to understand the issue.398 UNESCO specifically presented its proposal for multidimensional pilot projects aimed at empowering youth and addressing the spread of extremism among youth online.399 Not only does this threaten international security, but it is also detrimental to the sustainability of development and the future of the world’s next generation.
Case Study: Capacity-Building in the Horn of Africa Region
 The Horn of Africa remains one of the most complex and problematic regions in the world. Countries within the region suffer from political instability, ongoing conflicts and humanitarian crises.401 Moreover, since the attacks of 11 September 2001, the region has been considered a major source of terrorism.402 In order to address these issues, the Horn of Africa Region Capacity Building working group was established within the Global Counterterrorism Forum.403 The working group identifies the current counter-terrorism challenges, capacity gaps of the state and seeks for measures to address these gaps, involving financial resource, expertise, and mobilizing political will.404 For the Horn of Africa, the working group identified 5 major capacity-building directions, which are: “law enforcement, criminal justice and rule of law, border management, countering violent extremism [CVE], and countering terrorist financing.”405 During their most recent plenary session on 11-14 March 2014 the Working Group noted that countering violent extremism is strongly interconnected with development, and especially underlined the importance of stability in Somalia for security in the region.406 They also discussed the necessity to increase the amount of trainings for the growing number of law enforcement officers, judges, and prosecutors in frames of Anti-Money Laundering/ Countering the Financing of Terrorism.407 At the latest plenary meeting of the Working Group, INTERPOL shared its plans to expand the use of its databases through cooperation with the International Organization for Migration and combining their databases on one platform, with a pilot program in Tanzania and Djibouti.
Conclusion
 International terrorism and terrorist groups, such as ISIL, Al-Qaida, and their affiliates, pose a serious threat to international peace and security. The crimes committed by these groups continue to cause enormous human suffering around the globe. In order to combat terrorism and restore peace and security in the affected regions, Member States must address the issue considering all existing challenges, including the incitement of terrorism, recruitment of foreign terrorist fighters, radicalization of youth, and the financing of terrorist groups activities through trade. In 2001, Secretary-General Kofi Annan stressed the necessity for the UN to change a “culture of reaction to a culture of prevention” as the only way to counter terrorism.409In the UN system, the SC plays the most important role in facilitating this change, but it also depends on the endeavors and resolve of all Member States on national, regional, sub-regional, and international levels, as well as their ability to reach consensus to achieve this. 

Further Research
While the issues pertaining to terrorism and counter-terrorism are complex, there are a few questions which delegates should consider as they continue their research. How can the international community ensure the respect of human rights while countering terrorism? How can the process of creating a universal terrorism definition be facilitated? Acting under its mandate, how can the SC address the issue of youth radicalization and its root causes, especially online recruitment? What else can Member States do to address the issue of terrorist groups financing? How can the Member States control the recruitment of foreign terrorist fighters from their states through direct contact with recruiters as well as via social media? How can capacity be increased among Member States for combatting terrorism?  

    

Topic Guide for Human Rights Council

History of the LGBT Community
Over the course of the last decade, the issue of LGBTQ (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transsexual
and Questioning) rights has become one which increased attention has been focused on, but
public debate over attitudes towards homosexuality has taken place, it goes without saying,
for hundreds of years. Both the Old and New Testament of the Bible, for instance, have what
have been interpreted to be a number of different references to homosexuality, with the most
obvious being Leviticus 18:22(You shall not lie with a man as a woman; that is an abomination’)
whilst the Qur’an also has been interpreted as referring to homosexuality, with Sir Iqbal Sacranie, the then head of the Muslim Council of Britain, denouncing same sex marriages as “harmful” and “something we would certainly not, in any form, encourage the community to be involved in”.
It should be said, however, that at the same time there is considerable evidence suggesting
that the acceptance of same sex relationships (or of trans people or of those identifying with
some other sexual orientation or gender identity) is not a recent phenomenon either.

Sex relationships were also, as is fairly well known, very common in Classical Antiquity
James Davidson points out that “The secret of Greek homosexuality has only ever been a secret to those who neglected to inquire”,going on to note that same sex relationships were so prevalent in Ancient Greek society that the Romans took to referring to the practice of such relationships as ‘The Greek Custom’.Depiction of Ganymede, a male lover of Zeus in Ancient Greek mythology. In Europe, at least, religious debates over the ‘morality’ of homosexuality later gave way to similar debates framed in a more secular manner, with the language used being more medical or psychological than theological.
The modern gay rights movement began in 1969 when the world first started to explore the causes and nature of homosexuality. The first pride parade, known as the March of Stonewall, took place in New York in 1969 and sprung from a police raid on an illegal gay bar. The movement started with people forming organizations that worked to repeal laws prohibiting consensual homosexual conduct, pass legislation barring discrimination against gays in housing and employment, and encourage acceptance of homosexuals among the rest of the population. Throughout the United States, the Supreme Court repealed sodomy laws in 2003. Once seen as a mental illness that was curable through therapy and religion, homosexuality became seen as having to do with biology, psychology, politics, and genetics, leading to acceptance in many regions of the world
Corresponding to this shift in the scientific community in attitudes towards LGBT
individuals has been a broad shift in what might be referred to as ‘Western’ countries towards
legal acceptance, and recognition of the rights of, LGBTQ individuals. This has, however,
happened at varying speeds. In the UK, for instance, homosexuality was legalised in 1967
following the Introduction of that year’s Sexual Offences Act by the British Parliament
whilst in the USA, Gay Marriage was legalized this year.
Rights of the LGBT Community Throughout history, the LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender) community has experienced victimization and unequal treatment. Across the globe, discrimination based on sexual orientation is prevalent, and violent acts of persecution including physical abuse, rape, and murder are inflicted upon LGBT people. The UN Charter boldly states that the United Nations wishes to encourage “respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms for all without distinction.” Similarly, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights declares that “all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights,” and “everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind.” The difficulty in ensuring fundamental human rights for LGBT citizens worldwide lies within the complications when balancing national sovereignty and human rights. While state sovereignty should not be undermined, universal human rights encoded within international law are intrinsic and to be guaranteed.
Laws that affect the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) community depend vary greatly from country to country, and even region to region. Everything exists throughout the world from legal recognition of same-sex marriage to the death penalty for participating in such acts. LGBT rights are considered human rights by the United Nations but currently each nation creates their own laws and standards. LGBT rights often include government


recognition of same-sex marriage, anti-bullying legislation, immigration equality laws, anti-discrimination laws for employment and housing, hate crime laws providing enhanced criminal penalties for violence against LGBT people, equal age of consent laws, and laws related to sexual orientation and military service. Anti-LGBT laws include sodomy laws penalizing consensual same-sex sexual activity with fines, jail terms, or the death penalty; higher ages of consent for same-sex activity; laws prohibiting same-sex marriage; and laws prohibiting same-sex adoption.
The United Nations did not pass its first resolution recognizing LGBT rights until 2011, when it urged all countries to pass laws to protect the LGBT communities. In many parts of the world, however, this resolution has not yet been recognized. The resolution is trying to expand the idea that LGBT rights are human rights and reduce the amount of violence and discrimination against the LGBT community. There are no boundaries as to how far these issues can go and campaigns for LGBT rights are frequent. A commonly stated goal is social equality for LGBT people.
In some parts of the world, people are more focused on building LGBT communities or working toward liberation for the broader society of sexual oppression. In a large part of the world, specifically in parts of Africa and the Arab world, any acts pertaining to the LGBT community are strictly illegal. Many of the nations that protest LGBT rights make the arguments that these rights are not covered in the Universal Declaration on Human Rights and that decisions regarding restrictions on LGBT rights should be matters of national sovereignty. Many cultures are greatly influenced by branches of Christian, Islamic, and Jewish religions that establish gay sexual activity as a “crime against nature” and as such believe that individuals who choose to engage in gay sexual activity should be punished. In the 1800s, punishment for sodomy was often done by means of fire in order to cleanse the soul of its unholy actions.


LGBT RIGHTS IN:
Africa
Africa have the most restricted LGBT rights in the world. Out of the 55 states recognised by the United Nations or African Union or both, the International Gay and Lesbian Association stated in 2015 that homosexuality is outlawed in 34 African countries. Human Rights Watch notes that another two countries, Benin and the Central African Republic, do not outlaw homosexuality, but have certain laws which apply differently to heterosexual and homosexual individuals.
In Mauritania, Sudan and northern Nigeria, homosexuality is punishable by death. In Uganda, Tanzania, and Sierra Leone, offenders can receive life imprisonment for homosexual acts. In addition to criminalizing homosexuality, Nigeria has enacted legislation that would make it illegal for straight family members, allies and friends of the LGBT to be supportive. According to Nigerian law, a straight ally “who administers, witnesses, abets or aids” any form of gender non-conforming and homosexual activity could receive a 10-year jail



sentence. South Africa's constitution has the most liberal attitudes toward gays and lesbians, with a constitution which guarantees gay and lesbian rights, and legal same-sex marriage.
The Americas
Laws governing lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) rights are complex in the Americas, and acceptance of LGBT persons varies widely. Same-sex marriages have been legal in Canada nationwide since 2005, in Argentina since 2010, in Brazil nationwide and Uruguay since 2013 and in the United States nationwide since 2015. In Mexico same-sex marriages are performed in Mexico City and the states of Quintana Roo, Coahuila, Chihuahua and Guerrero, and those unions are recognized nationwide. Same-sex marriages are legal in the Caribbean Netherlands, while marriages performed in the Netherlands are recognized in Aruba, Curaçao and Sint Maarten. More than 600 million people live in nations or sub-national entities in the Americas where same-sex marriages are available.
Furthermore, some other nations have laws recognizing other types of same-sex unions (Colombia, Ecuador and Chile), as well as LGBT adoption and military service by LGBT people. However, eleven other nations, all of them in the former British West Indies, still have criminal punishment for buggery on their statute books. These eleven countries include Jamaica, Dominica, Barbados, Guyana, Trinidad and Tobago, Saint Lucia, Antigua & Barbuda, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Grenada, Saint Kitts and Nevis & Belize
Europe
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) rights are widely diverse in Europe per country. Twelve out of the eighteen countries that have legalised same-sex marriage are situated in Europe; a further thirteen European countries have legalised civil unions or other forms of recognition for same-sex couples. Austria, Germany, Italy, Hungary and Switzerland are considering legislation to introduce same-sex marriage. Same-sex marriage in Slovenia and Ireland is to become legal in 2015. In addition, it will be enacted in Finland by March 2017. Malta is the only country in Europe that recognizes legally performed same-sex marriages overseas but does not perform them. Belarus, Bulgaria, Croatia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Montenegro, Poland, Serbia, Slovakia and Ukraine have a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage
Asia
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) rights in Asia are limited in comparison to many other areas of the world. Same-sex sexual activity is outlawed in at least twenty Asian countries. While at least nine countries allow same-sex people to serve in the military, only Israel provides a wider range of LGBT rights - including same-sex relationship recognition.
In the Islamic regimes of Afghanistan, Brunei, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Yemen, homosexual activity is punished with the death penalty. The legal punishment for sodomy has varied


among juristic schools: some prescribe capital punishment; while other prescribe a milder discretionary punishment such as imprisonment. In some relatively secular Muslim-majority countries such as Indonesia. Jordan and Turkey this is not the case
In many nations, religion is still affecting the rights of LGBT communities. Many nations also choose not to acknowledge gay rights because they do not see homosexuality as a legitimate issue while many nations are as advanced as accepting gay marriage nationally. There is no limit to how far these issues spread and what a large group of people they are affecting. While in many nations there has been organized activity to protect the rights of the LGBT community, little has been done yet on a global scale…so perhaps, the time to create universal standards is now.

Transgender Rights
The findings of Injustice at Every Turn, (a report by the National Transgender Discriminatory Survey) indicate specific discriminatory acts transgender people are faced with in the USA. Keeping in mind that LGBT people live a life which is significantly more liberal and respected in the Americas, the findings/analysis of the oppression the transgender community struggles with is horrific. Using a sample of 6,450 transgender and gender non
conforming individuals, a synopsis of the report emphasizes the lack of opportunities, which even in the 21st century world, people were willing to give the respondents. In comparison to the general population, respondents were four times more likely to come from a household of extreme poverty.
The sample experienced unemployment twice as much as the general population and furthermore, the rate of unemployment faced by transgender people increased with people of colour.
Respondents who lost jobs due to antitransgender/homophobic perceptions were four times more likely to turn to self-destructive measures. 41% of the respondents claimed to have attempted suicide, in comparison to the general population, 85% more would find
themselves imprisoned usually because 70% more (than the general population)

would resort to drugs and excessive alcohol consumption. Rea Carey, executive director of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force accurately stated that “This report is a critical call to action for our policymakers to confront these horrifying realities by enacting protections without hesitation," Many employers and businesses in even the western parts of the world recognize that transgender people can very easily fail to conform to the work environment and the prestige of their staff would be undermined if they employed cross dressers.
Aside from workplace discrimination, transgender people are verbally if not physically harassed at public facilities and are usually given last priority whether it comes to
waiting for a health service or public transport. In Pakistan, transgender men commonly known as ‘hijras’ are persistently harassed by the police and are turned on the street and forced to submit to prostitution to earn a living. However On January 29th it was reported that chief justice , Iftikhar Chaudhry announced that it was the authorities obligation to ensure that hijras “enjoy the same rights as other Pakistanis, in matters of inheritance, employment and election registration. This was an exceptionally progressive step taken in a highly conservative society however the main issue is the implementation of these laws. The responsibility of protecting and promoting the transgender community in countries where homophobia and anti-transgender bias is illicitly ignored by governments as the general population themselves do not view it as a civil rights issue.

Questions to Consider
1.What are your country’s citizens’ views on LGBT rights? How does the general
population treat LGBT individuals? To what extent can your country ameliorate the legal condition of LGBT citizens?
2.What intrinsic (social or historical) challenges does your country face in addressing LGBT equality? How do these challenges influence your country’s relationship with other nations?
3.How can the United Nations consolidate such broad views on LGBT rights to create a medium for the governance of LGBT individuals
4.Religious and cultural beliefs can get in the way of the battle for rights of sexual minorities. Is there a way for countries to agree to an anti-discrimination legislature and extend their help to these sexual minorities without infringing any sovereign rights of the country?
2) How can HRC help the LGBT community in countries where they are continually persecuted (discrimination, violence, arbitrary detention) on grounds of a different sexual orientation from the norm?
3) What more can be done to allow better access of healthcare services and education (basic human rights) for the LGBT community?
4) How can HRC further ensure that sexual minorities fleeing persecution on grounds of sexual orientation are given a priority for seeking asylum in countries? How can we ensure that these individuals will also protected and not sent back to their place of origin where their
lives will be threatened?

Points a Resolution Should Address
This section concerns areas of the topic which any resolution on the topic should seek to at
east discuss in some depth, although the following list is by no means exhaustive. These
points are:
1. To what extent the promotion of LGBTQ rights is compatible with, or mandated by,
existing Human Rights law in the form of agreements such as the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights, among others;
2. Whether the promotion of LGBTQ rights by the UN threatens the national
sovereignty of UN member states who might claim ‘cultural’ or ‘religious’ reasons for
rejecting it under the terms of the UN Charter or other
relevant agreements, as well as
how the sensitivities of individual UN member states might be addressed regardless;
3.How the UN and HRC might go about promoting LGBTQ rights in a more
proactive manner than has been put forward in the HRC resolutions which have
previously addressed this topic;
4. How the UN can work with IGOs (such as the EU) and Non-Governmental Organizations which have had a relative amount of success in promoting LGBTQ rights in order to make such initiatives more effective.
Further Reading
UN Free and Equal (UNFE) is the UN Campaign for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender equality, with more information on what the UN is currently doing to promote LGBTQ rights. The site for the campaign is https://www.unfe.org/
76 CRIMES is an NGO which keeps a comprehensive record of countries in which homosexuality has been made illegal or which have laws which impede LGBTQ rights in some way.This information can be found at http://76crimes.com/76-countries-where-homosexuality-is-illegal/
The previously-mentioned High Commissioner’s report to the Human Rights Council on violence and discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity (A/HRC/19/41) can be found here
DELEGATE MANUAL SISHMUN 2015 Page | 11


The Office of the UN Human Rights Commissioner has also produced a booklet called ‘Born Free and Equal’ which “sets out the source and scope of the some of the core legal obligations that States have to protect the human rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) people” (which can be read in a language of your choosing) 

Tuesday, 25 November 2014

Meet Your Chairs

CHAIRS OF HISTORIC SECURITY COUNCIL
KARAN RAJ 
LALHMINGMOI INFIMATE 
CHAIRS OF SPECIAL CONFERENCE

SANJUKTA CHOUDHURY

VAIBAV GARG
CHAIRS OF DISARMAMENT AND INTERNATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL

SIDDHARTH KAR

NAINA GUPTA
CHAIRS OF HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL
APOORVA PRAKASH

AVEEVA SAIKIA

Topic Guide for Human Rights Council

AXEL MODEL UNITED NATIONS
HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL (HRC)
TOPIC: WOMEN RIGHTS IN ARAB NATIONS


Women in the Arab world, as in other areas of the world, have throughout history experienced discrimination and have been subject to restrictions of their freedoms and rights. Some of these practices are based on religious beliefs, but many of the limitations are cultural and emanate from tradition as well as religion. These main constraints that create an obstacle towards women's rights and liberties are reflected in laws dealing with criminal justice, economy, education and healthcare.[
Politics[edit]
There have been many highly respected female leaders in Muslim history, such as Shajar al-Durr (13th century) in Egypt, Queen Orpha (d. 1090) in Yemen and Razia Sultana (13th century) in Dehli. In the modern era there have also been examples of female leadership in Muslim countries, such as in Bangladesh, Pakistan and Turkey. However, in Arabic-speaking countries no woman has ever been head of state, although many Arabs remarked on the presence of women such as Jehan Al Sadat, the wife of Anwar El Sadat in Egypt, and Wassila Bourguiba, the wife of Habib Bourguiba in Tunisia, who have strongly influenced their husbands in their dealings with matters of state.[38] Many Arab countries allow women to vote in national elections. The first female Member of Parliament in the Arab world was Rawya Ateya, who was elected in Egypt in 1957.[39] Some countries granted the female franchise in their constitutions following independence, while some extended the franchise to women in later constitutional amendments.[40][41][42][43][44]
Arab women are under-represented in parliaments in Arab states, although they are gaining more equal representation as Arab states liberalise their political systems. In 2005, the International Parliamentary Union said that 6.5 per cent of MPs in the Arab world were women, compared with 3.5 per cent in 2000. In Tunisia, nearly 23 per cent of members of parliament were women. However, the Arab country with the largest parliament, Egypt, had only around four per cent female representation in parliament.[45] Algeria has the largest female representation in parliament with 32 per cent.[46][47]
In the UAE, in 2006 women stood for election for the first time in the country's history. Although just one female candidate - from Abu Dhabi - was directly elected, the government appointed a further eight women to the 40-seat federal legislature, giving women a 22.5 per cent share of the seats, far higher than the world average of 17.0 per cent. [2]
The role of women in politics in Arab societies is largely determined by the will of these countries' leaderships to support female representation and cultural attitudes towards women's involvement in public life. Dr Rola Dashti, a female candidate in Kuwait's 2006 parliamentary elections, claimed that "the negative cultural and media attitude towards women in politics" was one of the main reasons why no women were elected. She also pointed to "ideological differences", with conservatives and extremist Islamists opposing female participation in political life and discouraging women from voting for a woman. She also cited malicious gossip, attacks on the banners and publications of female candidates, lack of training and corruption as barriers to electing female MPs. [3] In contrast, one of UAE's female MPs, Najla al Awadhi, claimed that "women's advancement is a national issue and we have a leadership that understands that and wants them to have their rights." [4]
Women's right to vote in the Arab world[edit]
Women were granted the right to vote on a universal and equal basis in Lebanon in 1952,[48] Syria (to vote) in 1949 [49] (Restrictions or conditions lifted) in 1953,[50] Egypt in 1956,[51] Tunisia in 1959,[52] Mauritania in 1961,[53] Algeria in 1962,[54] Morocco in 1963,[55] Libya [56] and Sudan in 1964,[57] Yemen in 1967 [49] (full right) in 1970,[58] Bahrain in 1973,[59] Jordan in 1974,[60] Iraq (full right) 1980, [59] Kuwait in 1985[61] (later removed and re-granted in 2005) and Oman in 1994.[62] Saudi Arabia announced that it would give women the right to vote in 2015.[63]
Economic role[edit]
In some of the wealthier Arab countries such as UAE, the number of women business owners is growing rapidly and adding to the economic development of the country. Many of these women work with family businesses and are encouraged to work and study outside of the home.[64] Arab women are estimated to have $40 billion of personal wealth at their disposal, with Qatari families being among the richest in the world.[65]
Education[edit]
Since Islam encouraged equality between the sexes, Islam has also encouraged equality in education. In all Arab countries, girls, just like boys, usually get their full education in highschool and even move onto getting a Graduate diploma, and this has been going on for a long time after the 1960s.
Travel[edit]
Women have varying degrees of difficulty moving freely in Arab countries. Some nations prohibit women from ever traveling alone, while in others women can travel freely but experience a greater risk of sexual harassment or assault than they would in Western countries.
Women have the right to drive in all Arab countries except Saudi Arabia.[66] In Jordan, travel restrictions on women were lifted in 2003.[67] "Jordanian law provides citizens the right to travel freely within the country and abroad except in designated military areas. Unlike Jordan's previous law (No. 2 of 1969), the current Provisional Passport Law (No. 5 of 2003) does not require women to seek permission from their male guardians or husbands in order to renew or obtain a passport." In Yemen, women must obtain approval from a husband or father to get an exit visa to leave the country, and a woman may not take her children with her without their father's permission, regardless of whether or not the father has custody.[68] The ability of women to travel or move freely within Saudi Arabia is severely restricted. However, in 2008 a new law went into effect requiring men who marry non-Saudi women to allow their wife and any children born to her to travel freely in and out of Saudi Arabia.
From Jordan to the United Arab Emirates, a look at women's rights across the Arab world on the occasion of International Women's Day.
Jordan
Women can travel freely without permission from their husbands or male relatives. They hold public posts and female pilots, police officers and soldiers. Recently, Jordan's parliament passed a law that allows Jordanian women married to foreigners to pass on their nationality to their children. However, domestic violence and "honor killings" still happen.
Saudi Arabia
King Abdullah has granted women the right to vote and run in the 2015 municipal elections. The king also appoints 30 women to the top advisory body, the Shura Council. The body cannot legislate and its male-dominated chamber has so far not taken up a request by three female members to discuss the issue of allowing women to drive. The Saudi government also has rolled out a law penalizing domestic abuse, including neglect. The law does not address the guardianship system that grants male family members authority over their female relatives.
United Arab Emirates
Mothers can now pass their citizenship on to their children — giving them access to generous social services and stable government jobs. The UAE is among the most socially liberal of the Gulf states and authorities have made an effort to hire women to prominent government roles. However, traditional attitudes toward women have run up against the country's modern image. A 24-year-old Norwegian woman was sentenced to 16 months in prison last year for having sex out of marriage and on alcohol charges after she claimed she was raped by a co-worker. She and her alleged attacker, who was jailed on similar charges, were later pardoned after an international outcry.
Kuwait
Women earned the right to vote for the first time in 2005, and in 2009, four women won seats in parliament. As in nearby Qatar, they aren't able to convey citizenship to their children. Those born to Kuwaiti mothers do get the same benefits as Kuwaiti citizens up until they're 21. That includes free education, health care, and monetary benefits. Unlike in neighboring Saudi Arabia, women can drive and travel on their own. They aren't required to cover their heads, though expectations of modest dress remain as in other Gulf countries.
Iraq
There are no laws focusing on domestic violence against women. The country's 2005 constitution states that a quarter of parliament seats and government positions must go to women. This later was extended to provincial and local councils. But with the growing power of the religious institutions, women in some areas have been forced to put on veils and abaya — the long, loose black cloak that covers the body from shoulders to feet.
Women are members of parliament, Cabinet ministers and one of the country's vice presidents. The Syrian nine-member government delegation that went to peace talks earlier this year over its civil war included two women. In northeastern Syria, the Al-Qaida-breakaway group called the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant forced women in areas under its control to cover their bodies, including hands and faces. In other rebel-held areas, where less radical Islamic groups are in control, most women wear the Islamic veil.
Twenty-six women were slain by relatives in the West Bank and Gaza in 2013, twice as many as the year before, according to official figures. The rise stems from mounting economic difficulties in the Palestinian territories, compounded by ongoing leniency for those killing in the name of "family honor" and social acceptance of violence against women. Activists have urged Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas to repeal sections of a penal code that allows for short sentences for the perpetrators.
ON AN average day a woman walking down a street in Cairo can expect catcalls. On a bad day she may get persistent unwanted telephone calls, be flashed at or groped. Sexual harassment is so rife that almost every woman in Egypt has experienced it, according to a UN report released earlier this year. And it is getting worse. In a ten-day period this summer, Operation Anti-Sexual Harassment, a local organisation, recorded 186 cases. And rape, judging by an array of reports, has become more frequent.
In the 1950s and 1960s women began to make slow but steady strides in parts of the Arab world, such as Syria and Egypt. Even parts of the conservative Gulf began more recently to follow suit. In several Gulf countries female students now outnumber males at university. Across the region, more women are working. Saudi Arabia, where they must cover themselves in public, cannot drive cars and must remain under male “guardianship”, looks more like the exception than the norm.
But the turbulence of the Arab  spring appears to have slowed or even reversed progress. Saferworld, a London-based research group, notes that women in such places as Egypt, Libya and Yemen have found it hard to have their rights upheld. Threats against politically active women have increased. Female representation amid the turmoil has not noticeably risen. In Egypt it has plunged. In a survey of 22 Arab countries recently conducted by the Thomson Reuters Foundation, Egypt came bottom, rather controversially two rungs below even Saudi Arabia.
The rise of Islamist influence is partly to blame. Religious laws, allowing men to have four wives and to inherit twice as much as a woman, have in the past been curtailed as governments embrace more secular norms. But devout preachers have sought to reinstate restrictions. Syrians fear a resurgence of conservative laws if rebels linked to al-Qaeda, who are growing in strength, take over. “They tell my wife not to wear trousers and to cover entirely,” says Muhammad, a fighter from Latakia province on Syria’s coast. “But that is not our culture.”
Even in places where governments are relatively progressive on social issues, old-fashioned attitudes die hard. A recent survey of 850 people in Jordan’s capital, Amman, found that nearly half of teenaged boys and 20% of girls of the same age thought “honour killings” of women deemed to have flouted sexual norms could be justified. Many people uphold Islamic traditions to define themselves against the West, says Sarah Leah Whitson of Human Rights Watch, a lobby group based in New York.
Governments often do little to protect women. Women often speak of harassment by soldiers and police. A constitutional amendment to set a minimum age for marriage in Yemen, where child brides are standard, is still being argued over. The authorities in Egypt rarely act even when painstaking documentation of violence against women is presented, says Mariam Kirollos, a human-rights activist. In brighter spots such as Lebanon, personal freedoms in Beirut, the capital, such as a woman’s right to work and to wear and drink what she likes, are jealously guarded. Yet even there, legal protection for women—against domestic violence, for instance—is often absent. As in many other Arab countries, a woman married to a foreigner cannot pass her Lebanese nationality on to her children.
In the past, dictators tended to take ownership of the women’s rights issue to impress the West. When they fell, grassroots groups had to start from scratch. Over time this may lead to punchier and more genuine movements. In Egypt a group has launched an initiative called Harassmap that uses crowdsourcing to track assaults and encourage women to report them. In Saudi Arabia women are posting films of themselves behind the wheel on YouTube. Lebanese women are calling for a law against domestic violence. And women’s groups across the region are linking up on the internet. “There are so many movements on the ground”, says Ms Kirollos, “that things will change.”